|
TABLE C1 CONCRETE AIR CONTENT PRICE ADJUSTMENTS |
||||||
|
Air Content Range |
|
% Payment of Unit Price |
||||
|
Minimum |
|
Maximum |
|
|
||
|
1.1* |
and |
below |
|
0% |
||
|
0.6 |
to |
1.0 |
|
50% |
||
|
0.1 |
to |
0.5 |
|
75% |
||
|
Low air tolerance limit |
|
100% |
||||
|
|
Target |
|
|
100% |
||
|
High air tolerance limit |
|
100% |
||||
|
0.1 |
to |
0.5 |
|
98% |
||
|
0.6 |
to |
1.0 |
|
90% |
||
|
1.1 |
to |
1.5 |
|
80% |
||
|
1.6 |
to |
2.0 |
|
65% |
||
|
2.1 |
to |
3.0 |
|
50% |
||
|
3.1 |
and |
above |
|
0% |
||
|
|
||||||
|
*The Engineer may require concrete represented by air content more than 1.1% below the low air tolerance limit to be removed and replaced. |
||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
TABLE C2 WATER CEMENT RATIO PRICE ADJUSTMENTS |
||||||
|
Water Cement Ratio Range* |
|
% Payment of Unit Price |
||||
|
Minimum |
|
Maximum |
|
|
||
|
0.051 |
and |
above |
|
0% |
||
|
0.031 |
to |
0.050 |
|
50% |
||
|
0.021 |
to |
0.030 |
|
70% |
||
|
0.011 |
to |
0.020 |
|
80% |
||
|
0.001 |
to |
0.010 |
|
90% |
||
|
----- |
Limit |
----- |
|
|
||
|
* W/C deviation above the acceptable limits |
||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
TABLE C3 VIBRATOR FREQUENCY PRICE ADJUSTMENTS |
||||||
|
Vibrator Frequency |
|
% Payment of Unit Price |
||||
|
Minimum |
|
Maximum |
|
|
||
|
below 3500 |
|
|
|
90% |
||
|
3500 |
to |
3999* |
|
95% |
||
|
4000 |
to |
8000 |
|
100% |
||
|
8001 |
to |
9000 |
|
90% |
||
|
9001 |
to |
10,000 |
|
75% |
||
|
above 10,000 |
|
|
|
50% |
||
|
* Engineer may extend the lower specification limit to include this range |
||||||
|
Note: Price adjustment shall apply to area half the distance to the adjacent vibrator or edge of slab and the length traveled during the non-compliance |
||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
TABLE C4 CERTIFIED PLANT INSPECTION PRICE ADJUSTMENTS |
||||||
|
Type of Work |
|
Daily Price Adjustment |
||||
|
Structural Concrete & Patching |
|
$500 |
||||
|
Paving |
|
$1,000 |
||||
|
Note: Price adjustment in table is for failure to provide any certified plant inspection for placement/day. If a partial day is provided or if a portion of the testing is conducted, then the price adjustment should be prorated accordingly. Plant monitoring is an agency responsibility. Failure to provide plant monitoring could impact project funding but no price adjustment should be assessed. |
||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
TABLE C5 LATE CURING APPLICATION PRICE ADJUSTMENTS |
||||||
|
Time After Finishing (hrs) |
|
% Payment of Unit Price |
||||
|
½ |
to |
<1 |
|
95% |
||
|
1 |
to |
<1½ |
|
80% |
||
|
1½ |
to |
<2 |
|
65% |
||
|
2 |
to |
<3 |
|
50% |
||
|
|
|
More than 3 |
|
40% |
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||